Atlanta .NET Regular Guys

News

Brendon Schwartz - Email Me
Matt Ranlett - Email Me

Brendon Schwartz

MVP Logo
Community Kit for SharePoint
View Brendon Schwartz's profile on LinkedIn

Matt Ranlett

Matt Ranlett MVP Logo

Community Links

Useful Links

SharePoint 2007

ASP.NET 2.0

Atlanta Area Bloggers

BizTalk

SharePoint 2007 WebControls

SharePoint 2007 Development

A new beginning for AMP

The Atlanta Microsoft Professionals group has been through more than one change in its history.  It started life as the Atlanta.NET Mobility group, but was probably before its time.  Next came the AMP name and the SharePoint 1, 2, 3! training sessions.  The 18 hours worth of presentations and hands on labs were incredibly well receivied, but the creation of that material took a huge effort from those involved and we're probably not going to repeat that for free.  It really was a lot of work.

However, we still believe that we can fill a need in the Atlanta .NET community with our original charter - a group focusing on professional Microsoft toolkits.  This allows us to explore beyond development topics.  To that end, our new focus is SharePoint and the Information Worker's toolkit.  This will certainly include the various flavors of SharePoint 2007 (WSS, OSS Standard and Enterprise, Search, etc) as well as Office 2007 and even some third party products.

Last night was the first of these meetings and we split the meeting in half along the developer/information worker line.  The first part of the meeting was a developer focused topic and Dan Attis presented Feature development to the group.  At the highest level, a feature is a wrapper around a set of functionality which can be individually enabled or disabled inside of a SharePoint installation.  Features can include other features and can be scoped at various points along the Web farm to Site heirarchy.  Features are composed of at least an XML file and can include resource files and expanded XML definitions.  For more information, check out Dan's presentation which will be online at DevCow.com sometime in the near future.  If you're dealing with features on a regular basis, you might find Todd Baginski's little Feature Manager tool a helpful friend.

The second presentation of the evening was given by yours truly (that's Matt Ranlett for those of you who aren't paying attention).  I took the power user/information worker slant and presented task management to the group.  I started off by showing the out of the box templates available for tracking tasks, issues, and project tasks (Gantt view).  We looked at the available KPIs for monitoring the task lists and the out of the box Three-State Workflow for automating the task.  My intention was to follow up this out of the box presentation with a demonstration of Ascentn's AgilePoint but I couldn't remember the password on the virtual PC image and had to simply explain about Business Process Management and AgilePoint's super slick Visio UI.  I plan to come back to this tool at some point in the future as I believe that this kind of tool will become an invaluable part of streamlining business processes in the future.

The presentations were both well received by the audience, bringing out a lot of questions and general comments from the group.  One thing we heard over and over from the audience was that there appears to be a gap in the available online and printed information about SharePoint.  There is plenty of high level out of the box types of discussions around and there are plenty of deep dives into the development of a particular niche of SharePoint, but there is no business value overview.  What people seem to be asking for is the 10 minute or less pitch that they can take to their management teams and say, "We should buy SharePoint 2007 because...".  This is not necessarily an easy space to fill, but we're going to work together to identify and fill the gaps a little bit at a time.  To that end, we're hosting an open forum where anyone who is interested can post their thoughts.  This is where you can help steer the presentation topics toward what you'd like to see, post general comments, and give feedback to the group's leaders.

The Information Worker and SharePoint 2007 are broad topic areas and we can easily spend over a year covering this material.  If you have particular areas you'd like to see, or if you would like to present some of the material yourself, please get in touch with us either via the forum or by e-mail. We would really love feedback from you. Please let us know if there is anything we can do to help you learn more. However, having said that, please keep in mind that this is a volunteer effort and that asking us every detail of how to implement a technology will likely come with a bill! ;-)

If you are interested in presenting material on SharePoint 2007, Office 2007, or any Information Worker toolkit, please let us know.  If you do not volunteer to give a presentation, you will have no choice but to listen to us give the presentations.

If you are looking to sponsor the user group, here is what we can offer you. In exchange for approximately $150 worth of pizza, you get 15 minutes on stage to present your company's product and marketing message. You also get your logo on our event's web page and mention in the DevCow blog covering the meeting. Finally, we will provide all of the attendees with any printed material you wish to hand out. Thank you for your interest in the group and it is my genuine hope that your sponsorship pays off for you in real dollars as well as general goodwill.

Comments

Michael Rivera said:

First, let me say that the entire INETA team does a great job providing high quality training and events. I personally appreciate all the time and resources each of you put into the events. You should be highly commended for your efforts. These events provides a meduim for networking, sharing ideas and

Second, In relation to the post on SharePoint 2007, if you attend the all the events (SQL, cutting edge, VBUG, MSP...) so far a majority of the topics that have been discussed have been well presented and brushed upon fairly well. There has been touch of high level business focus along with some minor focus on implementation and development. But attending all the user groups events require a certain level of effort that each person may not be willing to make.

Finally, I was at the meeting on the 19th and there was a lot of discussion about what should be discussed and how it should be done. Since I am a SharePoint expert this may not hold a lot of wait, but I felt there may have been a certain unappreciation to what has been given. If we review some of the topics there has been a lot of topics of sharepoint that has been done. Integration with Reporting Services, implementing features in SharePoint, and Advancements with MOSS are just to name a few. I even mentioned the Sharepoint 1,2,3 but then realized that I should just appreciate what has been given. After all, without your efforts we would have nothing.

I again want to thank the entire INETA team and its sponsorship for its efforts, without them I have to say my career and educational development would be very limited. Each of these groups have open my eyes to new technologies like I never seen before. Thank you.

FYI... on a side note. If you were to do another topic on SharePoint, perhaps there can be one on the following: Using a before and after approach, take just one custom or non custom feature, business need or requirement for sharepoint that an a company has come up with and seeing how one would implement and deploy this feature. Then since Sharepoint is very robust and feature rich, there are many paths a person can take as far as filling a business need seeing what paths a dev or technology specialst can take. My big question I guess I am asking is "When does a developer,technology specialist build a custom and when does he/she not? and where does a developer/technology specialist start? (toolkit, dlls, install Office Server, add-ons....)".

<please excuse and typos>
# February 21, 2007 5:36 AM
Leave a Comment

(required) 

(required) 

(optional)

(required)